<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Bug Report on</title><link>https://dawning.ca/tags/bug-report/</link><description>Recent content in Bug Report on</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><copyright>Copyright © James Snell</copyright><lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 18:50:45 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://dawning.ca/tags/bug-report/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Quest to Submit an Internet Explorer Bug Report</title><link>https://dawning.ca/posts/ie-bug-insanity/</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 18:50:45 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://dawning.ca/posts/ie-bug-insanity/</guid><description>
&lt;figure style="float: right; margin: 0 0 1em 1em; max-width: 89px;">
&lt;img src="https://dawning.ca/uploads/2009/07/ie_fail.png" alt="">
&lt;figcaption>Put Simply&lt;/figcaption>
&lt;/figure>
&lt;p>Here&amp;rsquo;s the anti-epic tale of my distinct efforts to improve Microsoft Pusher &lt;strong>I&lt;/strong>nternet &lt;strong>E&lt;/strong>xplorer.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Why would I want to improve IE? Well, I don&amp;rsquo;t really, but a sad number of users on the net don&amp;rsquo;t yet know any better. It seems clear to me that Microsoft&amp;rsquo;s selection of what web standards to implement (not the &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Wide_Web_Consortium">W3C internationally agreed upon standards&lt;/a>, but rather their own) must be either the product of negligence or an attempt to push their own agenda (mainly to make their competition look foolish in the eyes of their lesser informed users). I think that kind of approach can only work for so long - users continue learn.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>