<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>/Etc/Fstab on</title><link>https://dawning.ca/tags/etc/fstab/</link><description>Recent content in /Etc/Fstab on</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><copyright>Copyright © James Snell</copyright><lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 17:30:34 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://dawning.ca/tags/etc/fstab/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Ubuntu 9.10 remote mounts via sshfs</title><link>https://dawning.ca/posts/ubuntu-sshfs/</link><pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 17:30:34 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://dawning.ca/posts/ubuntu-sshfs/</guid><description>
&lt;p>Hey just a fast post here.. I&amp;rsquo;ve been using sshfs on Ubuntu (meh, linux in general) for awhile as a means of securely remotely accessing my files. I&amp;rsquo;ve taken some steps to add a line to my /etc/fstab file to make this run smoothly&amp;hellip;&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Though today I ran in to a really weird situation. I found that despite having a &lt;code>uid=xxxx&lt;/code> line, the appropriate user wasn&amp;rsquo;t getting ownership of the mount. In fact, when that user would look at the permissions for the mount, it returned something like &amp;ldquo;d???? ? ? ?&amp;rdquo;. Whisky Tango Foxtrot.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>