<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Html on</title><link>https://dawning.ca/tags/html/</link><description>Recent content in Html on</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><copyright>Copyright © James Snell</copyright><lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 14:37:40 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://dawning.ca/tags/html/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Pretty Cycling Images and URLs</title><link>https://dawning.ca/posts/pretty-cycling-divs/</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 14:37:40 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://dawning.ca/posts/pretty-cycling-divs/</guid><description>
&lt;p>I recently tossed up my little cycling badge of things I like (to the left) and in the process I had to do some CSS/jQuery &amp;ldquo;research&amp;rdquo;.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>I found &lt;a href="http://jonraasch.com/blog/a-simple-jquery-slideshow/">THIS really helpful guide&lt;/a> that nicely explained everything, but it wasn&amp;rsquo;t precisely what I wanted. I found that in using the code as given there, all the images would grossly load in a stack and images of different sizes would remain visible in the stack as they cycled. I also didn&amp;rsquo;t really like the idea of the fading animations being tied to the IMG tag, I wanted to use a more generic DIV container instead, after all I like writing code I can easily re-use later.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Quest to Submit an Internet Explorer Bug Report</title><link>https://dawning.ca/posts/ie-bug-insanity/</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 18:50:45 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://dawning.ca/posts/ie-bug-insanity/</guid><description>
&lt;figure style="float: right; margin: 0 0 1em 1em; max-width: 89px;">
&lt;img src="https://dawning.ca/uploads/2009/07/ie_fail.png" alt="">
&lt;figcaption>Put Simply&lt;/figcaption>
&lt;/figure>
&lt;p>Here&amp;rsquo;s the anti-epic tale of my distinct efforts to improve Microsoft Pusher &lt;strong>I&lt;/strong>nternet &lt;strong>E&lt;/strong>xplorer.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Why would I want to improve IE? Well, I don&amp;rsquo;t really, but a sad number of users on the net don&amp;rsquo;t yet know any better. It seems clear to me that Microsoft&amp;rsquo;s selection of what web standards to implement (not the &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Wide_Web_Consortium">W3C internationally agreed upon standards&lt;/a>, but rather their own) must be either the product of negligence or an attempt to push their own agenda (mainly to make their competition look foolish in the eyes of their lesser informed users). I think that kind of approach can only work for so long - users continue learn.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>